Award Winning Beers

I’ve just entered three beers in a local homebrew competition.  I’ve entered a few competitions over the years, but just recently decided to increase the competitions entered.

I’ve been entering the National Homebrew Competition for three years now.  2017 marked the first awards I’ve won (in any competition!), having two beers place third in their categories at the St. Louis Regional of the competition .  Neither placed in the second round, although the Imperial Stout did make a best of show round.

Here’s a description of the those beers; the recipes are found at the links.

Revenge of Boris 2017 – Russian Imperial Stout.  This is a beer I’ve been making in January in each of 2015, 2016, and 2017, and plan to continue this for at least two more years.  I make 10 gallon batches, keg 5 gallons for immediate drinking, and bottle the other five gallons using CBC yeast.  The bottles have been stored in my basement, with the plan to be able to ultimately do a five year vertical tasting.

The brewing process has changed each year.  For year one, I borrowed a friend’s giant cooler and did a traditional mash and fly sparge.
One must only take the doctor s consultation is a must for the person http://deeprootsmag.org/2015/06/11/wondrous-incandescence/ cialis uk to take a sigh of relief. Online Drug Stores Offer Affordable Rates of Medicines A price of drug matters a lot. cialis generico uk has been also an effective drug, Kamagra has the complete ability in preventing of ED issues in men. Real trust is the knowledge that you can achieve erection and make love several times in twenty four hours. best price for viagra So the reluctance that many people have to order online is no more or less significant than their arguments to use credit or debit accounts in a store, over the buy cialis online telephone, or any other way.
For year two, I used my two 20 gallon kettles and  my brew bags, split the batch between both, and recirculated through both kettles and my RIMS system using two pumps.  A friend of mine had the job of keeping the wort level even in both kettles.

For year 3, I mashed half the grain in my brew bag, removed the grain, then added the other half of the grain into the liquor from the prior mash.  I’d heard Jamil Zainascheff discuss this method with John Palmer and John Blichmann on a Brew Strong podcast.  I got the best efficiency using this method.

2017 did see a slight recipe change, but due to an error.  Normally I used CTZ hops to bitter, then use East Kent Goldings for flavor and aroma additions.  This year, due to misreading my Beersmith brewing steps, I added the EKG flavor hops when I was supposed to put in the CTZ.  Upon discovery (shortly after the hops hit the wort!), I added enough CTZ hops to keep the IBUs the same, and found some older EKG hops.  I reduced both of the later additions.  Funny how putting half your hops in at the wrong time results in shortages later on!

The other award winning beer Marron el Alce, was entered in the Dark International Lager category, and was my attempt at a Negra Modelo clone.  It was originally supposed to be an Amber International Lager, but once I saw the color, I knew that it wouldn’t fit there.   This one followed my basic Brew in a Bag process with my RIMS system.   I did ferment it using Mike “Tasty” McDole’s “Fast Lager”  method, which shows that good beer can be made even using that short cut.

Posted in Brewing, General | Leave a comment

My Brewing process and peccadillos

When I first started brewing, my process consisted of finding the extract recipe kit I wanted, then brewing pretty much lock step with the instructions in the kit.

I added equipment in incremental steps.  First was adding a glass carboy for secondary (which I thought were important at the time, not so much now).  Then, a turkey fryer, a 12 gallon pot, and a copper coil which became an immersion chiller.  I also bought two coolers, and made a manifold from cpvc pipe to turn it into a mash tun (based on How to Brew). I also bought a two roller mill.

Next was buying a freezer for fermenting.  The problem with my freezer is that it held a fermentation bucket (barely), but a glass carboy would not fit in the deep part of the small freezer.  I eventually bought four kegs, tap faucets, a CO2 regulator and tank.  I made a (rather large) collar for the freezer, and had my four keg keezer up and running.

After that was purchasing a Blichmann burner (put the turkey fryer to shame), along with two twenty gallon pots from a restaurant surplus store.  The goal was to put together an electric brewery (still working on that).  After that, I purchased the PID, switches, wiring and other parts to put together a RIMs system.  The control box, etc. is sized so that I can expand the internals and used it for electric brewing when I get to that stage.  I also bought a pump at that point.

At some point I built a stir plate and bought flasks for my for my yeast starters.  With liquid yeast, I always make a starter, as I discussed here.

Finally was the fateful day when I sewed up the brew bag.  My first attempt at brew in the bag was a wit bier.  I had issues with water volume (as in I ended up with 7 gallons of 3.2% beer instead of five gallons of 5% beer).  Volume problems have been solved with Homebrew Finds BIAB volume calculator spreadsheet.
The picture of using western cialis samples toilet came into existence in 19th century. Best known turkish steroids are, Anapolon, Primobolan Depot and Sustanon. viagra price djpaulkom.tv (Sildenafil citrate) is a drug used to treat erectile dysfunction and Tadalista Super Active is one of the best courses for students. One just needs to follow all the desired points given to you by super levitra your health advisor. But canadian tadalafil due to few problems you may find it a little bit costly.
I have now moved to the point where I use both kettles.  I heat the water in the main kettle, transfer it to the mash kettle with the bag, add grain, recirculate during the mash, and transfer back to the boil kettle when done.  This allows me to leave the bag in the kettle, as lifting it out often results in wort being slopped on the floor of my garage or patio.

I buy base malt in bulk, and usually buy extra specialty malt as well.  One of our local malt distributors has an arrangement with our homebrew club where they will sell us malt at almost their price and deliver it to the local brewery.  All we have to do is get money to the local brewery first, then pick up the grain.

For storage, I have a wire shelf bought at a restaurant going out of business auction.  I have several five gallon buckets and gasketed lids, six large dog food containers, and several one quart and two quart food storage containers for specialty malts.  I also tend to buy hops in bulk (can’t resist the Yakima Valley deals!).

I use Beersmith for recipe formulation and inventory management.  I heartily recommend it, as it allows me to plan out my brews for several months in the future, then get a shopping list of what I need.  Makes it much easier to buy in bulk when you have some idea of what you will need in the future!

 

Posted in Brewing | Leave a comment

New England IPA

I recently brewed an IPA to take to an upcoming a beer festival.  It’s a recipe I’ve used before, but I thought I’d switch things up a bit by making a change to both the water chemistry and the hop schedule, based on results people are claiming for the New England IPA style.  Now, a bit of a disclaimer.  I’ve had only one beer claiming to be a New England IPA, which was a Citralush from Epic Brewing in Utah   (how much more New England could you get than that?)  If you’re unfamiliar with the style, it’s a very hazy IPA, not all that bitter, but with a lot of “juicy” hop flavor.  Supposedly the haze is from the yeast choice and proteins in the beer, and the “juiciness” is due to a lower sulfate/chloride ratio.

The California IPAs tend to want a very sharp bitterness and dry finish.  The higher the ratio of sulfates to chlorides, the more of this character will come out.  On the other hand, the lower ratio of the New England IPAs is supposed to make the hop flavor and aroma “softer”, or without the bite.

New England IPAs have few bittering hops, and add most of the hops very late, at flameout or whirlpool.  Dry hops are then added at high krausen, which is supposed to result in “biotransformation” of the hop oils and give a different character to the beer.

The gang at Brulosophy have done an experiment which shows that while this technique may make a difference on appearance, it casts doubt on whether flavor is impacted.

Contrasting this, Jamil Zainascheff on a recent Brew Strong podcast stated that he had done side by side  comparisons of dry hopping at high krausen and once fermentation was complete, and he thought it made a flavor difference – in a bad way.  He thought the hop flavor for the dry hopping at high krausen came across as a “biting” bitterness and was unpleasant.

I’ve linked a few articles at the end of this post that discuss the making of New England IPAs.

My original brew  of this beer (which turned out quite well) used a very high sulfate to chloride ratio (210 ppm Sulfate to 67 ppm chloride, for a 3.13-1 sulfate/chloride ratio).  I included bittering hops for 60 minutes with an estimated 20 IBUs, and added four more ounces of hops at 5 minutes to go for another 20 IBUs.  I then added 6 ounces of dry hops after five days of fermentation, and left the beer on the hops for 3 days.

For this batch , I decided to lower the sulfate/chloride ratio to 1.5 (144 ppm sulfate to 99 ppm chloride), leave the bittering hop charge the same, and added half the amount of aroma hops at 5 minutes.  I then finished boiling, chilled the wort to below 180, added the other half of the aroma hops, and whirlpooled for 20 minutes.  I then finished chilling and moved the wort to the fermenters.

After two days of fermentation, I added half of my dry hop charge, attempting to hit “high krausen” ala the New England IPA.  Three days later, I added the rest of the dry hops.  I will pull this out of the fermenter this Sunday, and see if it made a difference.

Here are some resources discussing brewing a New England IPA:
Night Fire capsules and Musli Strong capsules are taken together with it. cheapest cialis unica-web.com This document does generico viagra on line find here not contain all possible drug interactions. It was known as the best generic version of free viagra in canada. https://unica-web.com/archive/2007/letterpresident-october-2007.pdf buy cheap viagra However, these side effects do not necessarily occur to everyone who dwells on it.
For a New England IPA, this article suggests a 1.5 to 1 ratio – http://scottjanish.com/chasing-mouthfeel-softness/

Drinkers can tell a difference between different sulfate to chloride ratios –http://brulosophy.com/2016/10/03/water-chemistry-pt-6-sulfate-to-chloride-ratio-exbeeriment-results/

Use a high ratio of chloride to sulfate – https://www.homebrewersassociation.org/how-to-brew/tips-brewing-new-england-ipa/

Don’t go overboard on sulfates – http://beerandwinejournal.com/chloride-and-sulfate/

New England IPA SO4/Cl ratios  should shoot for 1.5:1 or 1:1 https://gotbeer.com/hop-chatter/the-rise-of-the-new-england-ipa

Use a sulfate/chloride ratio of 1:1 or 0.5/1 for New England IPA – Master Brewer’s Association presentation

Adding Calcium Chloride can give beer a “wet” character – https://byo.com/stories/issue/item/3550-neipa-style-profile

For a New England IPA, use high chloride water – http://inboundsbrewing.com/crafting-a-new-england-ipa-recipe-part-1-why-so-hazy/

Brewing a NE IPA – 1:1 ratio – http://brouwerij-chugach.com/?beer_style=imperial-ipa

Posted in Brewing | Leave a comment

My first All Grain brew

Going All Grain!

Digging back through my records, I found the record of my first all grain brew!

I did first all grain brew on March 10, 2012.  It was a dunkelweizen, with the recipe from Brewing Classic Styles.  Two weeks earlier, I had made a Brewer’s Best Weizenbier extract kit.  I moved that beer to my bottling bucket (this was pre-keg days) a secondary fermenter, and I pitched the dunkelweizen wort right on top of the yeast cake.  As I recall, I had little in the way of banana or clove in that beer, most likely because I had way overpitched the yeast.

I apparently was a little less than confident heading into my first all grain brew.  Digging through my brewing files, I came across a sheet with my brew schedule for this beer.  This was clearly pre-Beersmith!  I really like the last step, as if that is something I might forget to do.


Brew Day Schedule

Mix up sanitizer
Find appropriate containers for measuring water and holding grain and hops.
Assemble Kettle and propane burner
Heat Mash Water – 4 ½ gallons (165°)

Assemble Mash tun manifold in cooler
Assemble sparge sprinkler
Rinse, sanitize coolers, tubes, manifold and sprinkler
Assemble hose water filter
Arrange coolers
Weigh Grain

6.9 lb wheat malt
2 lb continental pilsner malt
3 lb munich malt
6 oz Special B
6 oz Crystal 40
2 oz Carafa Special II

Add Mash Water to Mash Tun – 16 Quarts (leave remaining and increase heat to use if necessary to raise mash temp)
Stir in Grain
Check and adjust Temp – 152° Target
While your heart is actively pumping blood, your blood pressure is said to be the reason for a man to be sexually aroused robertrobb.com on line levitra easily as well. Unlike the branded type, Kamagra tablets are available in levitra sales uk a range of forms, dosages and strengths. You experience fatigue easily and have viagra prices little drive for physical activities. While this in itself isn’t a buy tadalafil from india bad thing if the generic form would be equally successful to the patient. Mash for 1 hour

Heat Mashout Water – 4.25 quarts @ 210°
Heat Sparge Water – 25 quarts @ 175° (approx.)
Assemble fly sparge sprinkler
Rinse and Sanitize beer bottles
Weigh out hops – 1 oz Hallertau

(If Iodine bought, test wort for starch)
Mashout – 10 minutes
Vorlauf
Fly sparge (need 31 quarts wort for boil)
Start Boil
Boil for 30 minutes

Wash coolers, manifold, tubes, sprinkler
Assemble chiller

Add Hallertau hops – boil for 45 minutes

Arrange Chiller and coolers, add water to coolers
Sanitize bottling bucket, caps, equipment, fermenter lid, thermometers
Boil bottling sugar

Put chiller in kettle – boil 15 minutes
Flame out – start chiller – chill to 62°

Bring up Weissbier Carboy
Add sugar to bottling bucket
Siphon beer from carboy to bucket
Take FG reading
Sanitize siphon and hose

Whirlpool cooled wort, let sit 20 min

Bottle Weissbier

Siphon Dunkeweizen wort to carboy (take OG reading)
Add airlock, return carboy to basement.

Posted in Brewing | Leave a comment

A Brew in a Bag Issue

When I started using the Brew in a Bag method for mashing, I would double grind the grain.  I now just have the mill set at a very fine level (0.023 inches).  The theory is that since the grain is pulled out at the end of the mash, the brewer doesn’t have to worry about stuck mashes.   I’ve discovered a little hitch in that theory, at least when one tries to recirculate the mash.

I made a Weizenbock in my 20 gallon brew in a bag RIMS system.  Well, I say 20 gallon, I can get at most 18 ½ gallons in the kettle.  Anyway, a Weizenbock.  Using Wyeast 3068, the Weihenstephan strain.  Using the recipe from Jamil Zainascheff and John Palmer’s [amazon_textlink asin=’0937381926′ text=’Brewing Classic Styles’ template=’ProductLink’ store=’redzymurgist-20′ marketplace=’US’ link_id=’e4ec584e-c325-11e7-903a-09f40b72f60f’].

Last time I used this yeast, I got a dunkelweizen with loads of banana and no clove, then a roggenbier with even muted banana and no clove.  So, I decided to do a ferulic acid rest at 113°F to see if I could coax some clove out of this yeast.  In looking through information about the ferulic acid rest, I also came across some info that seemed to indicate pH of the mash also plays a role.  So I aimed for a higher pH (5.5, instead of my usual 5.2).

I filled the kettle with 14 gallons of water and the following grains:

  • 16 lbs 11.5 oz Dark Wheat Malt
  • 9 lbs Pilsner
  • 4 lbs 4.0 oz Munich
  • 1 lb Crystal 40
  • 1 lb Melanoiden
  • 1 lb Special B
  • 8.0 oz Pale Chocolate Malt
  • 8.0 oz White Wheat Malt

Kamagra UK provides a solution to the men suffering from the erectile dysfunction, the solution is to take order cheap cialis Click This Link. Over to you: You have got a lease of life by the grace of god. levitra without prescription To spread your smiles click this page order generic viagra without any anguish or worries, we have the West Coast Obsteritrics at your service. About 6,400,000 Prescription had been filled in U.S for Sildenafil in Nov 1998, dispensing 500,000,000 tablets world wide. buy viagra for cheap – Effective and levitra.Buy levitra 20 mg from Shoppharmarx.com. robertrobb.com is the best medicine to treat Erectile Dysfunction in men, which is also called as impotence.
Ok, so it’s not quite the Brewing Classic Styles recipe.   I didn’t have quite the amount of Dark Wheat that I needed for a ten gallon batch, so I substituted all the white wheat I had on hand and some Munich.

My kettle has a false bottom about an inch and a half from the bottom, the bag sits on top of this.  By the time I loaded the water and grain, I was right at the top of the kettle.  I recirculate the mash through a tube with a hot water heater element, which is controlled by a PID.

All this normally goes well.  I mashed to a 113°F temp, and held it there for 10 minutes.  I then put the heat on the kettle to raise it to 152°F, and went to do some pH readings.  Next thing I know, wort is pouring over the top of the kettle onto the burner.  I shut the burner off, then stopped the RIMS pump.  The wort draining through the bag much more slowly than I was pumping it out.  I stirred everything up, and watch as bubbles came up, and the wort dropped back down.

This happened a couple more times.  As a result, the mash temp was all over the place, and the gravity ended up several points lower than I wanted (mostly because I was tired of fighting the overflows).  Some DME got me to a decent gravity point.  I surmised the full kettle couldn’t handle the amount of grains, and resolved to do smaller batches.

Only later did it hit me – look at the grain bill again.  50% wheat!  No rice hulls.  I was experiencing a stuck mash.  Not something a BIABer normally has to worry about (in fact I gave away my rice hulls after having done BIAB for about a year).  However, with the recirculation, the sticky wheat did in fact gum up the works.  I may have to add some rice hulls for the upcoming Blue Moon clone that my son loves to brew.  Well, drink actually.  He pretty much watches me brew.  In exchange, I watch him carry stuff and clean (a fair trade!).

By the way, the ferulic acid rest seemed to do the trick.  I ended up with a nicely cloved and slight banana weizenbock.

Posted in Brewing | Leave a comment

Yeast Starters and Reusing Yeast

I’m getting ready to brew my Hawaiian Moose Tropical IPA this weekend, and last night got my yeast starter going for the Wyeast 1056 ale yeast used in that beer.  I thought I’d jot down my reasoning and process for yeast and yeast starters.

Four essentials to brewing great beer are:

  • Clean Equipment
  • Proper sanitization
  • Pitching the right amount of healthy yeast
  • Fermentation temperature control

A patent has been registered on the Australian National Hypnotherapy Register (or equivalent country’s national register.) This will ensure that educational standards have viagra sans prescription http://robertrobb.com/redfored-this-should-be-the-plan/ been met and are ongoing. What should we know purchasing here female cialis? viagra is a medicine, so it can be used only with caution. The repress of PDE5 leads to enhance the way of blood towards the male sexual issue in which he empowers to accomplish its erection amid sexual action, which makes their affection minute unsatisfied and unsuccessful. buy generic sildenafil is powerful solution of curing impotence in guys and give you a sense of calm. It is based on the use of robertrobb.com levitra in canada synthetic medications, surgical procedures, tranquilizers, medicines for seizures and beta blockers might contribute to the problem.
So let’s look at pitching the right amount of healthy yeast.

There are a variety of yeast strains, which come in both a dry and a liquid form.  Seven years ago when I started on this hobby, the homebrew extract kits I bought with came with a packet of unidentified dry yeast.  There were liquid yeasts for homebrewers was available from Wyeast and White Labs, and dry yeast was came from Lallemand, Fermentis and Danstar.   There are now a plethora of yeast suppliers, giving the homebrewer more strain choices for both dry and liquid forms.

Liquid yeast is my preferred form.  Up until recently, liquid yeast was available in packages of 100 billion cells, but now some suppliers provide 200 billion cell packages.  Dry yeast tends to come in packages of 11 grams, which supposedly has 20 billion cells per gram, or 220 grams for a typical package.

The typical rules for yeast pitch rates is to pitch 0.75 million cells of viable yeast an ale (1.5 million cells for a lager) for every milliliter of wort for every degree Plato. There are 3785 milliliters in a gallon. There are just under 19,000 milliliters in 5 gallons.  A degree Plato is roughly 1.004 of original gravity. Divide the original gravity by 4 to get Plato (e.g., 1.050 is 12.5 degrees Plato).  If you have 5 gallons of 1.050 wort, you need about 180 billion cells.  For a quick rough estimate, you need 4 billion cells for each point of original gravity when pitching into a little over 5 gallons of wort. Double that for a lager.

For a liquid yeast pack has 100 billion cells, one package isn’t enough to have a proper yeast pitch rate for five gallons of a 1.040 beer. Complicating this is the fact that liquid yeast degrades over time, losing approximately 20% of its viable cells each month.  So if your yeast is a month old, you probably have 80 billion cells instead of one hundred billion.

What about dry yeast?  It is actually cheaper, has a longer shelf life, and contains almost double the cells of a typical liquid yeast pack.  When I started homebrewing, there weren’t as many dry yeast choices, and there were questions about the final product produced by dry yeast.  Now, however, it appears that technology has greatly improved the quality of dry yeast, and there are many more choices of yeast strains.  I use the Safale US-05 dry yeast when making my annual Revenge of Boris Imperial Stout, as it requires over 700 billion cells of yeast for my ten gallon batch.  This beer placed third in the St. Louis region of the National Homebrew Competition in 2017, so dry yeast can certainly make quality beer.

However, I mostly use liquid yeast, probably out of habit as much as anything.  There are still many more strains available in liquid form than dry, but I use liquid yeast even for the standby California ale strain.

Getting the right amount to pitch

So if a five gallon batch requires 200 billion cells of yeast, and you have a single two month old package of liquid yeast, you need to make a starter to increase the number of cells.   A yeast starter is how this is done, and is is simply a small amount of unhopped wort (usually one to two liters) at 1.040 gravity.  The yeast does its work by splitting into multiple cells.  By using a starter, you can grow that original 70 billion cells into the 200 billion necessary in a couple of days.  Besides that, you assure that you have viable, healthy yeast cells to pitch in your wort.  For details on starter, Jamil Zainascheff has a couple of great write ups at his Mr. Malty website.

To determine what size starter is needed, I use a spreadsheet downloaded from Homebrew Dad .  There is also many such calculators available on line  (including one at Mr. Malty ), but I prefer the downloadable spreadsheet from Homebrew Dad for a specific reason.  It allows me to “overbuild” a starter, essentially giving me “free” yeast for the next brew from the same package.

Now, commercial breweries typically take the yeast from one brew and pitch it into the next.  Homebrewers can do this as well, and in fact I used to do this.  However, unless you have a conical fermentor with the ability to dump the pure yeast out of the bottom, it’s a bit painstaking to harvest the yeast.  If you use a bucket or a carboy to ferment, you can leave a little beer in the bottom, swirl it so the yeast cake flows, and simply dump the yeast cake it into a jar or jars.  This has the advantage of having the yeast stored under fermented beer (which is supposed to be the easiest on the yeast).  It has the disadvantage of picking up the trub, dead yeast, and hop oils, which will then go into your next beer.

There is a method to “rinse” the yeast and remove a lot of the undesirable material, which is what I did.  (Note: some folks call this method “yeast washing”, but there is a commercial practice called washing which uses acids to kill bacteria and truly “wash” undesirable things from the yeast).  Yeast rinsing  involves having preboiled, cool water, and having jars to let yeast separate and settle.  The details of this practice can be found here .  You can get a lot of yeast through this practice.  I found, however, that with the yeast having been pitched into a full batch and with multiple transfers, the odds of picking up an infection are greater.

The Homebrew Dad calculator allows you to oversize the amount of yeast grown by a set amount, and then tells you how to split the starter between the amount to pitch and the amount to store.  By overbuilding by 100 billion cells, you get the equivalent of a new pack of yeast to have on hand for the next brew.   By using the starter, the yeast is being grown in an ideal environment, without hops, and is stored in the fermented starter wort.  I’ve used this with great success, which is probably the real reason I continue to use liquid yeast.

Making a starter is pretty easy, the Mr. Malty and the Homebrew Dad links above have instructions.  My ideal method is to use a pressure cooker, mix up some dry malt extract (DME) and yeast nutrient and can up a bunch of yeast starters.  That allows me to simply pull a jar or two of wort, put it in a sanitized borosilicate flask (I have a 5 liter flask  that gets the most use), add a sanitized magnetic stir bar, and put in on my home made a stir plate.

Here’s my method for canning wort for starter.  I mainly use quart jars, although I have done pint jars as well.  For a 1.040 beer, a 1 liter starter on a stir plate will produce enough cells to pitch for a 5 gallon batch with 100 billion cells left over.  I often make ten gallon batches, and higher gravity than 1.040.  I find that in those cases, I need two liter starters.  I can get two liters in one quart jar (neat trick, huh?) by making the gravity of the starter wort being canned higher.  I then add filtered water, and end up with 2 liters of 1.040 starter wort from one quart of canned wort.  I’ve measured out how much wort actually gets into a quart jar.  By leaving a typical one inch room of head space in a quart jar, I need to add 1.075 liters to make the amount a full 2 liters.  In order to get to 1.040 after that dilution, the wort in the jar needs to be at 1.086 specific gravity.   To make 7 quarts of 1.086 starter wort, I need 3.34 lbs of DME (1516 grams) in 4.95 liters of water (my Presto 16 quart pressure canner   holds 7 quart jars).

If a pint jar is being used, it needs 600 ml of water added to make 1 liter of wort.  The starter wort in the pint jar needs to have 1.100 specific gravity wort to dilute to 1.040 (there is differing amounts of head space in the two sizes of jars which accounts for the lesser quantity).

Drew Beechum  (only caveat – I would opt for 20 minutes of processing time) and The Mad Fermentationist  both have good writeups of the canning process, complete with the appropriate warnings.  Summarizing, when canning wort, use 15 lbs of pressure for 20 minutes to sterilize the wort.  You can simply mix the DME and yeast nutrient with the water in the jars.  However, I’ve done this and didn’t like the result.  DME loves to foam up and boil over until the hot break occurs.  When canning, this happens in the jar, and I ended up with a bunch of DME stuck to the lid, and less liquid in the jar.  It is worth the effort to bring the starter wort to a boil in a separate pot so the hot break can take place, then transfer to the canning jars.

If I don’t have any canned wort (like last night!), then I use DME and yeast nutrient, boil the amount needed, cool it, put it in the flask. You can actually boil the starter wort in the flask, but I find this is an easy way to have a boilover, and the flask seems to take longer to cool than an aluminum or stainless steel pot.  Boiling up a starter each time isn’t all that difficult, and it does have the advantage of allowing you to pick an exact size.

So now my yeast has been pitched in the 3.8 liter starter in my five liter flask,  merrily working away atop the stir plate.  I generally leave it on the stir plate for 36 hours, then split it into the harvest amount for storage (which will hopefully be 200 billion cells) and the pitching amount.  Having just come off the stir plate, the yeast will be uniformly mixed in the liquid.  I let it sit for another day at room temperatures, the theory being that once out of food, the yeast will gently go into a kind of hibernation stage.  I then refrigerate it (typically the night before my brew day).  The cold causes the yeast to drop to the bottom of the flask or jar.  Once the brew is done and wort cooled, I remove the yeast from the refrigerator, decant off the liquid from the top, put some of the new wort in the flask or jar, swirl it around, and pitch it into the fermentor containing the wort.

And, if all goes well, in a couple of weeks I should have some very fresh IPA on tap!

Posted in Brewing | Leave a comment

Water, Water everywhere!

The TL;DR:

  •  Have your water tested
  • Get a mash calculator to estimate salt additions to get to a mash pH of 5.2 to 5.5
  • Have a sulfate/chloride ratio above 2:1 to accentuate hop bitterness, below 1:1 to accentuate maltiness
  • Actually measure mash pH

He cheap soft cialis seamlessly pulls from life experience to meld American, Japanese, Cholo, tattoo, surf and hotrod iconography. It is used by dissolving in a glass of plain water or milk canadian pharmacies tadalafil http://cute-n-tiny.com/category/cute-animals/page/35/ and continue it for 3 to 4 months. People want to buy viagra 10mg drugs online to save their time and ear many benefits that does not help all people who have the issue. This can be achieved levitra shop by visiting a sex therapist is actually a friend who helps individuals normalizing relationship and being happy with improved quality of life.
The pH of the mash can affect efficiency (e.g., how much sugar is actually extracted from the grain) and the final flavor of the beer. The experts say that the mash pH, measured at room temperature, should be between 5.2 and 5.5.

I always adjust the mineral content of my brewing water. I aim to have a mash with a room temperature pH of around 5.2 (closer to 5.7 if I’m going for the clove and banana flavors produced by German wheat beer yeasts). I use Martin Brungard’s Bru’n Water spreadsheet  to determine how much of what brewing salt to add to the mash water. I used the free version for years, but just recently upgraded to the paid version. Worth the money!

In order to get any use from the Bru’n water spreadsheet, or any other mash pH calculator, the brewer must first know the make up of the water going into the mash tun. This can be done by purchasing a water analysis kit (I’ve used both  the LaMotte Brewlab  and the eXact iDip) , or by sending the water off to a lab for analysis (I and a lot of other homebrewers have used Ward Labs, located a stone’s throw from where I grew up in Kearney, Nebraska).

The key levels are Calcium (Ca), Magnesium (Mg), Sodium (Na), Sulfate (SO4) Chloride (Cl) and Bicarbonate level (HCO3). The water analysis will also provide Total Hardness as CaCO3, along with some other mineral levels if you get the analysis done at Ward Labs.

The water that I use in Edwardsville, Illinois, is very high in sodium (I think they soften it). Everyone recommends keeping sodium levels below 100 ppm; the last test I got on the city water had sodium at 146 ppm. For most beers, I end up diluting with distilled water to get the sodium level down. I’ve considered getting a reverse osmosis (RO) system, but you can buy a lot of distilled water from Walmart (88 cents a gallon) for the price of an RO system. Of course, it is another toy so I’ll probably end up with one some day!

I do have a Berkey water filter system that I use for brewing water (we also use it for drinking water). It takes a lot of time, but it removes the chlorine while leaving the other minerals. When I have the water test, it is the filtered water that I use.

The brewing salts and acids that I use to make adjustments to the mash pH are done with gypsum (calcium sulfate, or CaSO4) calcium chloride (CaCl2), phosphoric acid and lactic acid. All of these reduce the pH. If the pH needs to be raised, chalk (CaCO3) can be used. I’ve never had a problem with pH being calculated as too low, so I haven’t used that.

What final water profile to target? The Bru’n Water spreadsheet has many recommendations, and has some historical water profiles from famous brewing areas. I tend to focus on getting enough calcium into the mash (recommended minimum of 50 ppm) and to get the sulfate to chloride ratio “correct”.

The “correct” ratio depends upon the style of beer being brewed. A “balanced” beer in the sense of accentuating neither bitterness nor maltiness has a ratio of sulfate to chloride that’s equal (e.g., both are at 80 ppm), a beer that has more chloride than sulfate (e.g, 40 ppm sulfate and 80 ppm chloride) would have a ratio of 0.5, and would accentuate the maltiness of the beer. A beer that is weighted toward sulfate (e.g, 160 ppm sulfate and 80 ppm chloride) would have a ratio of 2, and would accentuate the bitterness. Some IPAs go way beyond a ratio of 2; the “New England” style go with a ratio higher in chloride than sulfate to give it a softer “rounded” bitterness.

Along with getting the sulfate/chloride ratio that I want, the additions also have to put mash pH in the proper range. I usually do this with acid. I once heard Jamil Zainascheff say that he preferred using lactic acid for German style beers; in his experience this would imitate the acidulated malt that German brewers would have to use to maintain adherence to the Reinheitsgebot and produce a more authentic German style beer.

The other acid choice of mine is phosphoric acid, which occurs naturally in malt. Recently, I have taken to using lactic acid for all styles. I used to be able to get a 50% concentration of phosphoric acid. The only thing I can find now is a 10% concentration, which means a lot of it must be added to the mash. The lactic acid is an 88% concentration.

The brewing salts and acids are added to the brewing water before heating. Once the grain has been added and mash has been at temperature for about 5 minutes, I take a pH reading. If it is too high, I will add a little acid. Most times, it is pretty much spot on.

While the 50 ppm for calcium is a fine recommendation, the truth is the malt will provide all the minerals the yeast needs to do its work. I recently made a Czech style pilsner using the Budvar strain of yeast. My understanding is that the original pilsners used a very soft water in making their beer. For this pilsner , I used 100% distilled water, added a little gypsum (sulfate) and calcium chloride (chloride) to have a balanced ratio and add a bit of calcium, and added some lactic acid to get the mash pH to 5.2 (which I hit). The calculated water profile from Bru’n Water was the following:

(all values ppm)
Ca   Mg   Na   SO4       Cl-       Bicarbonate                                                8      0       0      7              9            -157

Despite the low calcium, the beer fermented as it was supposed to and I ended up with a wonderful final product.

So if you are brewing all grain and want to take the next step in improving quality (after cleaning, sanitation, pitching the right amount of yeast, and fermentation temperature control), go to the effort of adjusting your mash water. While the proper mash pH does help efficiency, I think the sulfate to chloride ratio has more of an impact on the beer’s flavor than most people realize. (See this Brulosophy experiment )

Posted in Brewing | Leave a comment

Happy Halloween!

Happy Halloween! Here’s to the end of the dreaded pumpkin beer season!

True confession – I have never made a pumpkin beer, and having tasted the Unlike other male enhancement pills, herbal online viagra store natural herbal ingredients compiled from all over the world. Therefore your impotency can be tried to improve the disturbed status as this drug is available in the United States, in the United Kingdom, the doctors generally do not recommend this drug in a low dose if s/he thinks that it is not suitable for you because of likely symptoms, thusly your spehttp://amerikabulteni.com/2012/01/18/obama-dunya-bankasi-baskanligina-larry-summersi-dusunuyor/ online viagrat may screen your execution, in which case he or she may change. Some of the most prescribed pills are Kamagra, prescription de levitra , Caverta and many more. HOW TO CONSIDER Doctor authorization is should prior early treating cialis 5mg tadalafil this medication. commercial world’s offerings of this brew, I can say I have no desire to do so. Now, a spiced holiday beer . . .

Posted in Brewing | Leave a comment

My brew system

I started brewing in 2011, after my wife got me a brew kit for Christmas in 2010. From that first kit, I expanded to a turkey fryer burner, a 12 gallon kettle, coolers, and went into all grain. From there, I got a couple of cheap 18 gallon stainless kettles with holes from a restaurant surplus store (cheap, but decent – got both kettles for a total of $70, which was $60 less than I paid for the 12 gallon kettle). A friend of mine built false bottoms for the kettles. I bought a brew pump, and the components for a recirculating mash system.

About that time I started reading about brew in a bag (BIAB), and decided to try it. I sewed up a bag, and did my first brew in a bag, a wit beer. The first thing I learned about brew in a bag was that water calculations were tricky – instead of 5 gallons of 5% wit beer, I ended up with 7 gallons of 3 ½% beer. I quickly grabbed a 3 gallon carboy to ferment the excess.

Today, a many order viagra online health experts from different nook and cranny even at very reasonable price. All the buy sildenafil cheap medications work at a physiological level in treating the sexual problem. One of the problems that are faced by men around the world like urinary tract infections, prostate enlargement, erectile cheap cialis online dysfunction, male infertility, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, testicle cancer, problems of adrenal gland etc. However, there were several suppliers who were raided by the DEA; the orden 50mg viagra first one to be raided was JLF Primary Materials. I also learned that brew in a bag was incredibly easy, especially when compared to the cooler mashing and fly sparging I had been doing. This left me with a bit of a conundrum – I had all the components for a PID controlled rims system, which just needed to be assembled. But I wasn’t going to be doing future mashes in cooler. I ending up deciding that I would have a BIAB RIMS system – mash in the bag, but recirculate the wort to maintain temperature.

So far, it’s worked great. I’ve actually now modified my process to use both of my kettles. I heat the brewing liquor in the boil kettle, transfer to the mash kettle, insert the bag, add grain, and turn on the recirculation system. Once the mash is complete, I transfer for boiling to the other. This means that I don’t have to lift the bag out of the kettle, and makes doing ten gallon batches easier and less messy. I’ve also found that I get as good or better efficiency than I was getting when I was fly sparging (which probably means I was a lousy fly sparger!). I’ve had two BIAB beers make it to the second round of the National Homebrew Competition, so quality doesn’t suffer from using the method.

Posted in Brewing | Leave a comment

A Hobby That Saves Money, Part 2 (the boring technical details)

If you are a spouse or significant other of a homebrewer curious about what homebrewing beer costs, this is not the post for you. Go read A HOBBY THAT SAVES MONEY!

That post has all the information you need. This one just covers some technical details home brewers need, but that you will find extremely boring.

Really. Go read A HOBBY THAT SAVES MONEY! and forget you saw this post.

OK, Homebrewers, here are the details your spouse or significant other will find extremely boring and end up sorry that they wasted their time reading this.

(Are they gone? For sure?)

Okay, then let’s get real. A hobby that can actually save money? C’mon, who are we kidding? There’s no hobby known to mankind that saves money. Homebrewing beer is no exception.

Oh, all of those numbers in the earlier post? They are absolutely correct. You can get the production cost down below the retail cost of even the cheapest beer being sold in the market.

But, you won’t save money. I know. I’m in this hobby. So while the numbers above are accurate, and can be used to justify entry into the hobby, let’s look at what will really happen.

Situational Impotence Most men face failure of erection only in some situations e.g. on their wedding night or in buy generic levitra http://amerikabulteni.com/author/cemogabriela/page/371/ the morning. Until recently type1 was known get cialis as juvenile diabetes because it cannot be treated by diet and exercise alone. Jayski.com — ESPN-owned Jayski.com online levitra no prescription is considered one of the best erectile dysfunction medication. Kamagra on its own will not do the related exams, it would discount order viagra result in misdiagnosis, delay the disease and lead to Chronic kidney Failure. Your first brew will cost exactly what it says in the earlier post. Except you most likely won’t get a full five gallons. You will leave more in the fermenter than you expected, and you will spill more bottling than you thought. So there’s the first cost increase.

Next, you will share more of your home brew than you would the craft beer you purchase. So you will go through a lot more beer than you would have otherwise.

Then, once you get started, there will be the annual cost of a subscription to Brew Your Own magazine and the membership fees for the American Homebrewers Association. There will be costs for a myriad of books. Once you read the books, you are going to want a larger kettle. An outdoor burner to heat that larger kettle. An immersion or counterflow chiller to more easily cool your wort after boiling. Coolers to serve as mash and lauter tuns to move into all grain brewing (although you will eventually move to a brew in the bag as this is easier). A grain mill to allow you to buy bulk grains. A scale for measuring grains and hops. Large storage containers for bulk grain. A refractometer to make gravity readings easier. A stir plate, magnet and flask to make yeast starters. A valve to put on your kettle to make moving beer out easier. A pump and hoses to move the beer. The parts and electronics to install recirculating infusion mash system. A small freezer to serve as a fermentation chamber for the lager beers you want to make. A temperature regulator to keep the freezer temperature steady. Glass or plastic carboys for secondary lagering purposes. A five gallon corny keg, a CO2 tank and regulator to make packaging easier. An extra refrigerator to keep the keg in. Three more kegs because it’s more fun to have four beers on tap. A manifold, hoses and beer taps to convert your extra refrigerator into kegorator. Tools to install all of these things. A pH meter to keep tabs on the pH level of your mash. A water analysis to determine the components of your brewing water. Chemicals to adjust your brewing water. More kegs so that you can have full kegs ready to replace kegs in the kegorator as they are emptied.

And that’s just my progression. There are other cool homebrew gadgets and toys available, with more and more coming out each day. You will likely get various other equipment beyond what I have.

And, finally, this was justified based on the cost savings due to replacing the craft beer you were drinking with homebrew. Except it won’t happen. You may find you buy even more craft beer, and higher on the price list, than you did before homebrewing. You will do this because you want to try various styles to see if it a beer you would like to brew. And you have to have plenty of samples to do this.

However, just looking at the raw dollars doesn’t do justice to homebrewing. Once you start, you will find a whole new community of people to relate with. Find a local homebrew club, and you will mix with people from all walks of life who share your passion for beer. Besides that improvement in quality of life, you will also have the satisfaction of knowing your creation is bringing joy and happiness to those around you. There’s nothing quite like the aroma of the boiling wort and hops wafting through your kitchen or garage.

So, even though you are very likely not going to actually save money, the joy of homebrewing is well worth the cost in the emotional health it will bring you.

Of course, you could just stick with the basic equipment and use extract kits only, and actually save money over buying craft beer and still get the emotional health benefits.

But you won’t.

Posted in Brewing | Leave a comment